Suggestions Received:
April 22, 2019
I would like to know if Tulsi is interested in expanding her position on immigration. Dianne Feinstein has proposed a Blue Card for farmworkers, which is good but does not go far enough. Below is an article I wrote that might interest Tulsi:
REFORM THE IMMIGRATION LAW TO MAKE SAFE, SANE AND PRODUCTIVE COMMUNITIES
INTRODUCTION:
The Immigration Law needs to be changed. It is over 50 years old, is unjust, harmful and makes no sense. It is necessary to make changes in the current immigration law to include:
1. Make Visas inexpensive and renewable every year and grant special visas to those who are already here working at low-paying jobs “illegally”.
2. Guarantee Minimum wage for all workers along with on-the-job health and safety provisions.
3. Grant Citizenship for all DACA recipients.
4. Abolish the Immigration Enforcement authority of ICE, which targets undocumented workers.
We also support the Sanctuary Cities and Safe Cities Movements which are a step in the development of safe, sane and productive communities in which people have full trust in law enforcement agencies – the key to “fighting crime”.
Sanctuary Cities are an American tradition and perhaps can be protected under “States Rights”.
I also feel strongly that a position on immigration such as the above would be welcome in the various immigrant communities, especially in the Latino communities.
Finally I also feel it is necessary to provide information "multilingually" so as to better reach out to the immigrant communities.
CONTENTS:
REFORM THE IMMIGRATION LAW TO MAKE SAFE, SANE AND PRODUCTIVE COMMUNITIES
INDEX
1. PREFACE page 2
2. INTRODUCTION page 3
3. CHANGE THE VISA REQUIREMENTS page 4
4. HOW CAN WE CHANGE THE LAW? page 5
5. HOW TO AMEND THE LAW: VISA WAIVER PROGRAM page 6
6. THE CURRENT SITUATION page 7
7. FREQUENT CRITICISMS page 9
8. CONCLUSION page 11
9. REFERENCES: page 12
1. Immigration Law page 12
2. Amendments page 15
3. Visa waiver program: countries page 15
4. Green card page 17
5. Rhode Island-first sanctuary state page 21
6. Deportations cause labor shortage page 22
7. Immigration History page 24
8. ICE, description of authority page 26
9. Impact on Black immigrants page 28
Thank you,
Paul Rogers
paulwaynerogers@gmail.com
805-258-3310
I would like to know if Tulsi is interested in expanding her position on immigration. Dianne Feinstein has proposed a Blue Card for farmworkers, which is good but does not go far enough. Below is an article I wrote that might interest Tulsi:
REFORM THE IMMIGRATION LAW TO MAKE SAFE, SANE AND PRODUCTIVE COMMUNITIES
INTRODUCTION:
The Immigration Law needs to be changed. It is over 50 years old, is unjust, harmful and makes no sense. It is necessary to make changes in the current immigration law to include:
1. Make Visas inexpensive and renewable every year and grant special visas to those who are already here working at low-paying jobs “illegally”.
2. Guarantee Minimum wage for all workers along with on-the-job health and safety provisions.
3. Grant Citizenship for all DACA recipients.
4. Abolish the Immigration Enforcement authority of ICE, which targets undocumented workers.
We also support the Sanctuary Cities and Safe Cities Movements which are a step in the development of safe, sane and productive communities in which people have full trust in law enforcement agencies – the key to “fighting crime”.
Sanctuary Cities are an American tradition and perhaps can be protected under “States Rights”.
I also feel strongly that a position on immigration such as the above would be welcome in the various immigrant communities, especially in the Latino communities.
Finally I also feel it is necessary to provide information "multilingually" so as to better reach out to the immigrant communities.
CONTENTS:
REFORM THE IMMIGRATION LAW TO MAKE SAFE, SANE AND PRODUCTIVE COMMUNITIES
INDEX
1. PREFACE page 2
2. INTRODUCTION page 3
3. CHANGE THE VISA REQUIREMENTS page 4
4. HOW CAN WE CHANGE THE LAW? page 5
5. HOW TO AMEND THE LAW: VISA WAIVER PROGRAM page 6
6. THE CURRENT SITUATION page 7
7. FREQUENT CRITICISMS page 9
8. CONCLUSION page 11
9. REFERENCES: page 12
1. Immigration Law page 12
2. Amendments page 15
3. Visa waiver program: countries page 15
4. Green card page 17
5. Rhode Island-first sanctuary state page 21
6. Deportations cause labor shortage page 22
7. Immigration History page 24
8. ICE, description of authority page 26
9. Impact on Black immigrants page 28
Thank you,
Paul Rogers
paulwaynerogers@gmail.com
805-258-3310
April 4, 2019
Bigger venues and let Sarah be in charge of events at least here in California! The Los Angeles event was excellent. Have war vets, climate scientist, younger generation speaker on tuition, start off her events, also the guys like Jimmy dore are good also like in LA
Dan Pirofali
roofdudes@gmail.com
Bigger venues and let Sarah be in charge of events at least here in California! The Los Angeles event was excellent. Have war vets, climate scientist, younger generation speaker on tuition, start off her events, also the guys like Jimmy dore are good also like in LA
Dan Pirofali
roofdudes@gmail.com
April 4, 2019
Tim Black
Please interview with Tim Black email address timtakes2@gmail.com. He has over 113,000 subscribers.
Ginger Beeler
gingerbeeler@att.net
Tim Black
Please interview with Tim Black email address timtakes2@gmail.com. He has over 113,000 subscribers.
Ginger Beeler
gingerbeeler@att.net
April 4, 2019
Do a Facebook live townhall on a military base.
Also do a townhall on fox.
Visit Houston Texas
Anthony Huckaby
Maoko89@gmail.com
346-715-5033
Do a Facebook live townhall on a military base.
Also do a townhall on fox.
Visit Houston Texas
Anthony Huckaby
Maoko89@gmail.com
346-715-5033
April 4, 2019
Making the budget understandable
When talking about budget cut that are being proposed by this administration, don't focus on the people that the cuts immediately impact, focus on where that money would have been spent. The money being cut from SNAP will hurt x number of people but it is x number of dollars that grocery stores will lose. The impact on the economy will be amplified because those stores will have less income, less profit and need to make cost cutting changes which will negatively effect the economy.
If the money for Special Olympics is cut, not only will those people be effected, but the events that are held will seriously effect that locations economy. No hotel rooms rented, no local spending by out of towners that can for the event, major economic damage for such a small price. The federal budget is over 4 trillion dollars. For most people that is to many zeros to comprehend. Frame the budget as if it's 4,000 dollars and how the 18 million dollars for the Special Olympics would be 1.8 cents or .018 of the 4000.
Speaking of budgets, do a breakdown of the budget. Show the big wedges for Social Security and Medicare, then explain that they have their own revenue supply and don't add to the deficit. Show the remaining wedge for the discretionary spending that gets it's money from personal income tax and corporate income tax. Show how the lowering of income taxes has reduced the revenue even thou jobs have continued to grow. If you have someone who can run the numbers if the tax cuts didn't pass and see what the revenue stream would have been that would probably be a huge difference. Feel free to email me if you want further explanation or a few other examples.
Robert Morrill
bigmopatsfan@gmail.com
Making the budget understandable
When talking about budget cut that are being proposed by this administration, don't focus on the people that the cuts immediately impact, focus on where that money would have been spent. The money being cut from SNAP will hurt x number of people but it is x number of dollars that grocery stores will lose. The impact on the economy will be amplified because those stores will have less income, less profit and need to make cost cutting changes which will negatively effect the economy.
If the money for Special Olympics is cut, not only will those people be effected, but the events that are held will seriously effect that locations economy. No hotel rooms rented, no local spending by out of towners that can for the event, major economic damage for such a small price. The federal budget is over 4 trillion dollars. For most people that is to many zeros to comprehend. Frame the budget as if it's 4,000 dollars and how the 18 million dollars for the Special Olympics would be 1.8 cents or .018 of the 4000.
Speaking of budgets, do a breakdown of the budget. Show the big wedges for Social Security and Medicare, then explain that they have their own revenue supply and don't add to the deficit. Show the remaining wedge for the discretionary spending that gets it's money from personal income tax and corporate income tax. Show how the lowering of income taxes has reduced the revenue even thou jobs have continued to grow. If you have someone who can run the numbers if the tax cuts didn't pass and see what the revenue stream would have been that would probably be a huge difference. Feel free to email me if you want further explanation or a few other examples.
Robert Morrill
bigmopatsfan@gmail.com
April 4, 2019
Infrastructure
I would like to share a bipartisan plan to rebuild America's infrastructure such that our Founding Fathers would approve. It uses a public infrastructure bank rather than private banks to finance and results in public, rather than private ownership of our infrastructure It is for the Common Wealth of the people, not the private wealth of the financiers. Please watch this short video that clearly explains how the financing using a public infrastructure bank works.
This is the way to rebuild our economy - the real American System of economics implemented the same way that Alexander Hamilton did it: a national infrastructure bank, capitalized with existing U.S. treasury debt deposited by creditors holding this debt. The interest on these deposits, which would be low but better than the interest the debtors are currently getting on their treasury bonds, could be easily paid by a financial transaction tax on Wall Street. This national infrastructure bank would then loan the money at a low rate of interest for long-term infrastructure projects that would pay for themselves many times over in the long run. The American System of economic development was founded by Alexander Hamilton who implemented it in the form of the First Bank of the United States. It was subsequently practiced by James Monroe and John Quincy Adams with the Second Bank of the U.S., by Abraham Lincoln with his Greenback program, and by Franklin Roosevelt with his Reconstruction Finance Corporation. This is the REAL New Deal. Accept no substitutes! To watch the video, copy this link into your browser:
Anthony Wicher
911truther@charter.net
909-273-9301
Infrastructure
I would like to share a bipartisan plan to rebuild America's infrastructure such that our Founding Fathers would approve. It uses a public infrastructure bank rather than private banks to finance and results in public, rather than private ownership of our infrastructure It is for the Common Wealth of the people, not the private wealth of the financiers. Please watch this short video that clearly explains how the financing using a public infrastructure bank works.
This is the way to rebuild our economy - the real American System of economics implemented the same way that Alexander Hamilton did it: a national infrastructure bank, capitalized with existing U.S. treasury debt deposited by creditors holding this debt. The interest on these deposits, which would be low but better than the interest the debtors are currently getting on their treasury bonds, could be easily paid by a financial transaction tax on Wall Street. This national infrastructure bank would then loan the money at a low rate of interest for long-term infrastructure projects that would pay for themselves many times over in the long run. The American System of economic development was founded by Alexander Hamilton who implemented it in the form of the First Bank of the United States. It was subsequently practiced by James Monroe and John Quincy Adams with the Second Bank of the U.S., by Abraham Lincoln with his Greenback program, and by Franklin Roosevelt with his Reconstruction Finance Corporation. This is the REAL New Deal. Accept no substitutes! To watch the video, copy this link into your browser:
Anthony Wicher
911truther@charter.net
909-273-9301
April 3, 2019
Visit Central California
Can you please pass this on to the campaign? Tulsi should seriously consider visiting Central Valley in California, making several stops. It would look really good if Tulsi visited the area and listened to residents when so many candidates ignore the area and visits are like getting money an ATM. Tulsi can stand out from the pack by being one of be first to visit, listen to concerns and show that she genuinely cares. It’s a great places to find voters and potential donors.
https://www.modbee.com/news/state/california/article228698419.html
Visit Central California
Can you please pass this on to the campaign? Tulsi should seriously consider visiting Central Valley in California, making several stops. It would look really good if Tulsi visited the area and listened to residents when so many candidates ignore the area and visits are like getting money an ATM. Tulsi can stand out from the pack by being one of be first to visit, listen to concerns and show that she genuinely cares. It’s a great places to find voters and potential donors.
https://www.modbee.com/news/state/california/article228698419.html
April 3, 2019
Fox News Town Hall
Please ask Tulsi’s campaign to try to get a townhall on Fox News. This would be a great way to reach a new audience who may not know anything about Tulsi. There are many conservatives and libertarians who may be open to some of her views especially on foreign policy. Most people still don’t know who Tulsi is and those who have heard of her only have heard negative things. This is a good way to reach viewers from across the aisle who are thinking about jumping off the Trump train. Bernie is doing a townhall on the network April 15 and I’m sure he and Tulsi may be the only candidates brave enough to get on Fox.
Fox News Town Hall
Please ask Tulsi’s campaign to try to get a townhall on Fox News. This would be a great way to reach a new audience who may not know anything about Tulsi. There are many conservatives and libertarians who may be open to some of her views especially on foreign policy. Most people still don’t know who Tulsi is and those who have heard of her only have heard negative things. This is a good way to reach viewers from across the aisle who are thinking about jumping off the Trump train. Bernie is doing a townhall on the network April 15 and I’m sure he and Tulsi may be the only candidates brave enough to get on Fox.
March 16, 2019
Sean Hannity's Show
How can we get Tulsi Gabbard on Sean Hannity's shows? He believes the Democratic candidates are weak and refuse to go on his show. Spontaneous Sign holdings for Tulsi all across the nation should happen. Are you in contact with Tulsi? More media petitions needed. Local radio and TV shows, grassroots appearances for Tulsi Gabbard, including editorials. I'm ready for Tulsi Gabbard 2020!
Sean Hannity's Show
How can we get Tulsi Gabbard on Sean Hannity's shows? He believes the Democratic candidates are weak and refuse to go on his show. Spontaneous Sign holdings for Tulsi all across the nation should happen. Are you in contact with Tulsi? More media petitions needed. Local radio and TV shows, grassroots appearances for Tulsi Gabbard, including editorials. I'm ready for Tulsi Gabbard 2020!
March 10, 2019
Be fair to Trump
You might find it strange, but Trump is my #2 choice after Tulsi. There are a lot of people out there like me who you will alienate by pushing anti-Trump rhetoric. Also, buying into identity politics instead of focusing on the issues is the opposite of what Tulsi would want.
Be fair to Trump
You might find it strange, but Trump is my #2 choice after Tulsi. There are a lot of people out there like me who you will alienate by pushing anti-Trump rhetoric. Also, buying into identity politics instead of focusing on the issues is the opposite of what Tulsi would want.
